Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1600

reference
505-tree-1
name
1600
tree-preservation-order

undefined

505-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.037103 50.886003)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.037046 50.885997,-1.037049 50.886008,-1.037057 50.886018,-1.037069 50.886026,-1.037085 50.886031,-1.037102 50.886033,-1.037120 50.886031,-1.037136 50.886026,-1.037149 50.886019,-1.037157 50.886009,-1.037160 50.885998,-1.037157 50.885986,-1.037149 50.885976,-1.037137 50.885968,-1.037121 50.885963,-1.037104 50.885961,-1.037086 50.885963,-1.037070 50.885968,-1.037057 50.885976,-1.037049 50.885986,-1.037046 50.885997)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL